Slow Food and Danish Politics
My cultural adjustment of the week occurred on Thursday. Our team at work went out for lunch after presenting to someone important. The traditional Danish lunch included three kinds of herring, salmon, eel and plaice followed by the main course. I'm used to that by now but still not a fish lover, by any means (I opted for the curry herring and the plaice). The large beer made it all go down better. It wasn't the herring, or the eel, or the beer at lunch on a workday that required the adjustment. It was after lunch when we filed out and a friend in front of me thanked the chef for lunch. The chef said, "You're welcome," then apologized for lunch being so fast. Had it not been for the fact that my boss's boss's boss had a meeting that started 1½ hours after lunch began, we might still be there. As it was, the chef felt that 1½ hours was too little to enjoy a proper meal. There's something to be said for that.
- Red-Green Alliance (Enhedslisten)
- Socialist People's Party (Socialistisk Folkparti)
- Social Democrats (Socialdemokraterne)
- The Danish Social-Liberal Party (Radikale Venstre)
- Liberal Alliance
- The Liberal Party (Venstre)
- Conservative People's Party (Konservative Folkeparti)
- Danish People's Party (Dansk Folkeparti) - link only in Danish, naturally
First of all, the names seem to reflect how things have changed over the years. The Danish name for the Social-Liberal party is the Radical Left. These "Radicals" sit in the center of the political spectrum. The Venstre (Left) party is on the conservative side of the spectrum. What passed for progressive left politics in 1870 when the party was founded is now mainstream. Second, the large field of parties makes it more likely that someone can find something that suits their views rather than supporting the lesser of two evils. Third, the large number of parties makes it virtually impossible for one party to gain a majority, making it a necessity to work together to solve the countries problems (we can hope). The last point is that parties can have platforms that are difficult to pigeonhole into the Progressive-Conservative standard that has evolved in the U.S. An example is the Danish People's Party, an ultra-nationalist party opposed to immigration and E.U. participation; but supportive of expanded welfare programs (especially for the elderly - their base), stronger punishments for criminals, and (according to their website) animal welfare.
Enough politics... If you've read this far, I congratulate you for your persistence. You should be rewarded for your interest with this bit of news. Alexa and I are expecting a baby to be born in the beginning of August. Wish us luck! Anya hasn't caught on to it yet, but we think she'll be a great big sister!
2 Comments:
I was very interested in the political discourse. When in Ireland our guide talked with us about the Irish political system of electing leaders; and about the many candidates and parties. I know that many in the US ardently defend our two party system...but I really wonder if we wouldn't be better off with more parties, and more candidates. Lesser of two evils is a pretty poor choice and has got us in a very bad position in the US. In Ireland all the candidates (many, not just two) are continually voted upon knocking off the loosers, and thus whittling down to the one winner. Every vote counts and no vote is lost.
It is all worth considering but will probably never change in the USA. ...... And if you got to the bottom of this.....Congratulations are indeed in order (your Mom had already given me the good news!!!!!)lots of love from Maine! Joyce
You are living in the wrong country if you aren't fond of fish, still, after 4 years! Come back to USA /Texas and have a good steak! (smiley face).
Post a Comment
<< Home